Contact Us for a Free Consultation 1-800-790-8856

September 27, 2001-Who pays the damages for Sept. 11?

September 27, 2001-Who pays the damages for Sept. 11?

One day after planes first hit the World Trade Center, the Association of Trial Lawyers of America urged attorneys to avoid bringing lawsuits related to the attacks. But with thousands of casualties and tens of billions in damages at stake, neither victims nor lawyers who specialize in "mass torts" are likely to hold back for long. "It won't continue," says Federal District Court Judge Jack Weinstein of the Eastern District of New York. "There's too much money."

Victims' families are already retaining attorneys who handled previous disasters, including the Pan Am Flight 103 explosion over Lockerbie, Scotland, and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. This attack - with defendants ranging from airlines to a trail of terror suspects around the globe - promises to fuel some of the most complex litigation ever brought in the United States.

The first World Trade Center bombing killed six people, yet resulted in 500 lawsuits by 700 individuals, businesses, and insurance companies, asking for $500 million in damages. Eight years later, the case is still not finished. In this instance, legal experts say the government must fashion faster recovery methods that ensure victims' families can collect quickly and the courts don't get clogged. Last week, Congress voted to give victims or their families the choice of recovering from a pool of private insurance and government money administered by the Department of Justice or by suing in federal court in Manhattan.

American and United Airlines each had its liability capped at the level of insurance coverage held on the day the planes were hijacked. Taxpayers will pay the rest of the money paid out of the Department of Justice fund. Families who opt for the fund will probably get money faster but will likely receive money under an undetermined formula based on each victim's income and insurance. Victims who go to court could recover more, but risk getting nothing if the airlines run out of insurance money or go bankrupt.

Even after the airlines' money is exhausted, a lengthy roster of potential defendants remains. Osama bin Laden and countries that support his network top the list. Federal law allows terrorist victims to recover from countries that support the terrorists. Provisions of the law provide for huge money judgments designed to deter future terrorist attacks.

Former hostages in Lebanon and the families of terrorist victims have won judgments totaling more than $ 1 billion against Iran. Former Beirut hostage Terry Anderson was awarded $ 340 million last year.

The US government gives plaintiffs cash for the compensatory damages while holding assets of terrorist sponsors as a deposit until the country actually pays up. Anderson collected $ 40 million from the US Treasury, which now holds the claim against Iran. The US now has the rights to the other $ 300 million. It is holding Iranian assets as a security deposit until it recovers funds from the government of Iran, but hasn't actually seized the assets.

The US State Department could quickly open the doors to additional suits by adding Afghanistan or other countries implicated to the list of states sponsoring terrorism.

American assets of 27 terrorist organizations, individuals, and companies frozen Monday by President Bush could also be used for compensation. Victims will also probably sue airport operators, contractors that provide security, and the federal government for inadequate security. Any recovery from those responsible for airport security may be more complicated for the estimated 10,000 dead and injured victims on the ground.

Other potential targets: Florida flight schools where some of the hijackers trained, the World Trade Center's architects, and the World Trade Center building managers who told evacuees to return to their offices after the planes hit. And insurance companies, which may owe tens of billions of dollars in claims, could face suits if they invoke "act of war" exclusions to avoid paying benefits. As of now though, no insurers have opted to use such clauses. So far, trial lawyers have trodden carefully, fearful of taking the focus away from the victims' suffering or the manhunt for suspects. "We're not starting any lawsuits in the near future. It's unseemly," says the lead attorney in the 1988 Pan Am bombing suit.

"Beyond the sorrow and the grief and the sense of loss is the utter destruction of the family unit and the economic loss that is completely devastating," says Chicago attorney Donald Nolan, who has been approached by a dozen families of victims on all four hijacked planes. "That needs to be addressed to help these people heal." Delay may actually benefit lawyers in complicated cases such as this one, in which all the parties responsible are not yet identified, says Geoffrey Hazard Jr., a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. "As the dust settles, you'll have a clearer idea and begin to have suits," Dr. Hazard says.

When suits do commence, lawyers say they sometimes dig up valuable information or witnesses that law enforcement agencies miss during a criminal investigation. Whatever their value, the attorneys say they may find it prudent to limit their fees. In the WTC case, attorneys may limits their fees to 6 percent, instead of the 33 percent that is the norm. Or, as in the case of medical malpractice, legislators may enact laws limiting attorney fees.

In all airplane accident cases it is essential that measures be taken promptly to preserve evidence, investigate the accident in question, and to enable physicians or other expert witnesses to thoroughly evaluate any injuries. If you or a loved one is a victim of an airplane accident, call now at or CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT A SIMPLE CASE FORM. The initial consultation is free of charge, and if we agree to accept your case, we will work on a contingent fee basis, which means we get paid for our services only if there is a monetary award or recovery of funds. Don't delay! You may have a valid claim and be entitled to compensation for your injuries, but a lawsuit must be filed before the statute of limitations expires.

The personal injury information offered by Pasadena, California personal injury Lawyer and contained herein, regarding Pasadena, California personal injury statutes and Pasadena, California personal injury claimants' rights, is general in scope. No Pasadena, California personal injury attorney / client relationship with our Pasadena, California personal injury attorneys is hereby formed nor is the information herein intended as formal legal advice. Please contact a Pasadena, California personal injury lawyer regarding your specific inquiry. See Terms of Use.


The Law Offices of Robert Dourian is committed to answering your questions about personal injury law issues in California.

We offer a free consultation and we’ll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.